- Review
- Open access
- Published:
Fat, flames and ultrasounds: the effects of obesity on pediatric joint inflammation
Italian Journal of Pediatrics volume 51, Article number: 96 (2025)
Abstract
The association between childhood obesity and the early appearance of joint degeneration, particularly in the infrapatellar “Hoffa’s” fat pad, highlights the importance of early diagnosis and treatment. The purpose of this review is to describe the role of ultrasound imaging as a first-line imaging tool for the early detection, prevention, and follow-up of degenerative structural changes in children’s joints. By combining ultrasound findings with clinical assessments and indices, healthcare providers can gain a more comprehensive understanding of obesity-related joint alterations. This integrative approach enables early therapeutic interventions, improving outcomes for affected children. Proactive management of pediatric obesity will not only improve the long-term outcomes of obesity-related joint disorders but also reduce the burden of related complications, such as osteoarthritis, in adulthood.
Introduction
Pediatric obesity has become a relevant concern for public health, with immediate and long-term implications for health outcomes [1]. In addition to its recognized association with metabolic changes, the consequences of childhood obesity on musculoskeletal health and joint integrity are increasingly being diagnosed [2]. In children with obesity, excessive adipose tissue promotes early degenerative changes in load-bearing joints and the pro-inflammatory status, which can further exacerbate these degenerative processes, particularly in the knee [3, 4]. Located immediately posterior to the patellar tendon, the infrapatellar Hoffa’s fat pad is the largest of the anterior knee fat pads and plays an important role in knee biomechanics and stability through shock absorption. Moreover, it is also a metabolically active tissue that secretes inflammatory cytokines under the influence of obesity, leading to joint inflammation and damage [5, 6]. The fat pad of overweight children is prone to chronic inflammation due to the accumulation of cytokines, such as IL-6 and TNF-α, in macrophages [7]. In addition to mechanical stress, these cytokines promote the breakdown of cartilage and inflammation in the synovium, which can lead to joint dysfunction [8]. Ultrasound (US) imaging is a first-line noninvasive technique for assessing Hoffa’s fat pad that provides important findings concerning its structure and inflammatory status [9]. In children with obesity, Hoffa’s fat pad increases in size, and hyperechogenicity is associated with inflammatory markers and signs of joint dysfunction [10]. These imaging findings highlight the need for early identification and treatment of childhood obesity to prevent or reduce joint disorders, also demonstrating the effectiveness of US in this context as a diagnostic and monitoring tool [11]. This review describes successful strategies for preventing and managing joint-related conditions related to childhood obesity, combining clinical approaches and the most recent applications of musculoskeletal US in this field. US is an important tool in the early identification of these alterations and in assessing the effects of therapeutic measures, thereby guiding clinical decisions and management strategies (Fig. 1).
Impact of childhood obesity on joint health
Childhood obesity is a global epidemic affecting 10% of children worldwide and has rates as high as 20–25% in Mediterranean countries such as Italy and Greece [1]. According to recent data, childhood obesity has nearly tripled in the past four decades and continues to increase [12]. The implications for musculoskeletal health from this alarming trend are profound. Notably, children with obesity have up to a 30% greater risk of knee joint inflammation than their non-obese peers do, and some studies have reported a higher prevalence of severe obesity in adolescents [2]. In these patients, the infrapatellar Hoffa’s fat pad has become a major site of pathological change, playing a role in joint damage through biomechanics and metabolic changes [13]. Longitudinal studies have also shown that obesity in childhood not only predisposes individuals to early musculoskeletal degeneration but also has long-term consequences for joint health, dramatically increasing the risk of developing osteoarthritis in adulthood [14]. Moreover, recent epidemiological studies indicate that joint problems or knee pain affect over 30% of children with obesity, finding a causal relationship between childhood obesity osteoarthritis; however, comprehensive data remain scarce, highlighting a significant gap in current literature [15, 16].
Ultrasound can determine fat localization and integrating it with indices such as the fat mass index (FMI) can be very useful. The FMI is a scale that is calculated in much the same way as BMI; however, it is targeted specifically at fat mass, taking into account variations in body fat that BMI might overlook. It is calculated by dividing an individual’s fat mass, assessed by imaging or bioelectrical impedance analysis, by their height squared [17]. Another scale is the body adiposity index (BAI), which often concerns tools aimed at obesity measurement. The BAI calculates the proportion of body fat in relation to the patient’s hip and height. Even though BAI is an alternative to the widely used BMI, it adds another aspect to body composition, not just weight and height [18]. Nonetheless, these instruments are usually confined to more specialized clinical settings. For general population studies and routine health assessments, BMI and waist circumference are still the gold standards because of their simplicity and well-established associations with health risks [19]. However, US is not the primary tool for evaluating obesity in the general population, but it provides an insightful and detailed view of body fat distribution for clinical assessments, research, and patient care, especially when combined with indices such as the FMI and BAI [20].
Ultrasound findings
US imaging has revolutionized the diagnosis and follow-up of pediatric musculoskeletal disorders allowing healthcare providers to observe even minor changes in tissue structure and composition [21]. High-frequency transducers, working in the range of 10–20 MHz, make it possible to evaluate Hoffa’s fat pad and the surrounding knee joint with great precision, highlighting even subtle changes [22, 23].
Furthermore, advancements in technology have significantly improved the sensitivity of color-Doppler sonography, enabling the detection of even low-velocity blood flows. This enhancement is particularly valuable for assessing neovascularization and changes in blood flow dynamics in inflamed tissues, which are key features of pediatric musculoskeletal disorders [24]. Elastosonography adds another layer of depth to this method for evaluating tissue rigidity and providing valuable information about joint biomechanics [25]. Integrating diagnostic US imaging with clinical and laboratory data is crucial for developing more effective treatment plans and better outcomes among children with musculoskeletal disorders.
Hoffa’s fat pad is particularly affected by obesity, where chronic mechanical overload and systemic inflammation contribute to pathological changes, including synovitis and tissue degeneration. If untreated, these changes can lead to persistent joint inflammation, mobility limitations, and broader impacts on a child’s overall health and social well-being [4]. US in obesity assessment enables precise measurement of subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness, with a strong correlation (r = 0.697–0.907, p < 0.01) with total and segmental fat mass as measured by bone densitometry [26]. This method provides an accurate evaluation of fat deposits across different body regions, including the abdomen, thigh, and upper arm, making it a reliable tool for body composition analysis in clinical and research settings [26]. This technique is especially helpful in single-patient clinical evaluations where a thorough analysis of fat distribution is needed [17].
The US is a valuable tool for detecting early indicators of inflammation within Hoffa’s fat pad. These include an increased thickness, with pathological values typically exceeding 10 mm in the sagittal plane, as well as changes in echotexture, such as hyperechogenicity compared with normal tissue and loss of the normal fibrillar pattern. An elevated Doppler signal is another key feature, with a resistive index (RI) below 0.6 indicating active neovascularization and inflammation. Additional findings include free fluid around Hoffa’s pad and the impingement sign, observed as compression of the fat pad during knee motion, which may appear before clinical symptoms manifest [22]. Early detection enables timely interventions that target inflammation, thereby preventing prolonged pain and reducing mobility restrictions [27]. Table 1 describes US changes in Hoffa’s fat pad according to different authors.
Longitudinal studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have demonstrated the association between Hoffa’s fat pad changes, such as reduced size, and the progression of knee osteoarthritis in patients with obesity. While MRI remains the gold standard for assessing detailed structural changes and early cartilage degeneration, US offers distinct advantages, particularly for real-time, dynamic evaluations and cost-effectiveness. Indeed, US is favored over MRI in clinical practice due to its greater accessibility, lower cost, and feasibility for real-time, dynamic assessments, making it an ideal first-line tool for the evaluation of joint inflammation in children with obesity. However, both modalities have unique strengths and limitations that influence their clinical application (Table 2) [23].
US imaging is a cornerstone method for describing the complex dynamics leading to joint inflammation. An increase in echogenicity in Hoffa’s fat pad and synovial membrane represents acute inflammatory cell accumulation, and changes in tissue composition are a direct sign of inflammation [10, 28]. Subhawong et al. described fibrous areas of Hoffa’s fat pad as an US feature of the heterogeneous structure containing multiple foci of increased echogenicity and areas of edema as a homogenous decrease in echogenicity [28]. The presence of synovial fluid and synovial tissue thickening is also related to inflammation status, which is characterized by swelling and joint pain [29]. Power Doppler improves the assessment of blood flow in the knee to detect areas of inflammation and neovascularization, indicating the body’s response to the metabolic needs of inflamed tissues [10, 30, 31]. Basha et al. reported an enhancement of inflamed Hoffa’s fat pad flow signals on Doppler US [10]. Nalbant et al. reported increased stiffness via elastography in the thickening of Hoffa’s fat pad, a softer signal in lesion areas, and decreased stiffness or increased elasticity in edematous areas [32]. Satake et al. identified Hoffa’s pad fibrosis as an increased elastography signal [33]. This development underlines the principal role of US in the assessment of knee health in children with obesity, thus deepening the knowledge of the disease and providing direction for specific therapeutic strategies [34].
Further advancements in US technology, including the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), hold promise for addressing these limitations, potentially automating the detection and measurement of inflammatory changes, improving diagnostic accuracy, and reducing operator-dependent biases. AI and ML may also narrow the gap between US and MRI in terms of reliability for the early detection of subtle structural changes, monitoring disease progression [35,36,37], and potentially providing new possibilities for improving the health outcomes of children with obesity-related musculoskeletal disorders [38, 39].
Clinical applications in the management of pediatric knee inflammation
US is both a diagnostic tool, detecting inflammatory changes before the onset of clinical symptoms, and a therapeutic approach for pediatric patients with obesity-induced knee inflammation [24, 40]. This proactive approach can support healthcare providers in the initiation of timely treatment interventions, possibly by arresting the inflammatory process and avoiding more severe outcomes. Prognostically, US findings such as Doppler signal intensity and grayscale changes in the fat pad and joint structures can guide treatment adjustments and monitor therapeutic responses. Pratt et al. [41] highlighted that the integration of US in early arthritis clinics improved the accuracy of persistent inflammatory arthritis predictions in pediatric patients. Furthermore, US elastography can detect early changes in fat pad stiffness; increased in the case of fibrotic tissue or decreased in edematous areas, correlating with specific pathological states, aiding in targeted interventions [32]. Studies have demonstrated that US-detected synovial changes, such as increased Doppler signals and synovial hypertrophy, are strongly correlated with the severity of knee osteoarthritis and associated pain. Synovial hypertrophy has been identified as an independent predictor of knee pain severity and functional impairment; Wu et al. [42] demonstrated that participants presenting this sign showed a risk of experiencing pain six times greater. In addition, from a prognostic perspective, the presence of synovial inflammation visualized by US is associated with poorer long-term outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis, including a greater risk of persistent inflammation, pain, radiographic progression, and reduced therapeutic efficacy over time [43]. Power Doppler US has shown a significant ability to assess synovial perfusion changes after intra-articular corticosteroid injections, with notable reductions in Doppler signals corresponding to reduced inflammation and improved clinical outcomes [44].
In addition to monitoring, US imaging changes the accuracy of treatment administration. Its application in guiding intra-articular injections appears to be a significant advancement [45], enabling the precision and safety of the administration of drugs directly to inflammation sites [30]. Visual guidance facilitates accurate needle positioning, which enables therapeutic agents to be delivered directly to the target site, thereby optimizing the treatment outcome and improving the recovery outlook [31]. This approach aimed at precision not only improves the results of treatment but also decreases the risk of side effects, making it an essential tool in the management of obesity-associated knee inflammation [31]. In addition to obesity, factors such as family history, sedentary lifestyle, and metabolic abnormalities may influence joint inflammation risk, while the management approach may vary according to the degree of obesity. US screening for joint inflammation in children with obesity may be most beneficial when initiated at the onset of puberty (approximately 10–12 years of age), as hormonal changes during this period can amplify inflammatory responses. Early identification through such targeted screening could allow for timely interventions and help mitigate progressive joint damage. In cases where initial US findings are normal, reassessment could be considered every 12–18 months or sooner if clinical symptoms develop. Figure 2 represents a possible flowchart for the management of pediatric obesity-related joint inflammation.
Significance of early intervention
US-guided interventions usually concentrate on weight loss methods to alleviate joint overload and lower the systemic inflammation associated with obesity [46]. Dietary modifications, physical exercise, and behavior therapy have been found to be successful in increasing weight reduction and monitoring US markers of Hoffa’s fat pad inflammation [46].
Concomitantly, anti-inflammatory pharmacological approaches have been considered in combination with lifestyle changes. The management of symptomatic knee conditions in obesity has been marked by the administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) [46]. Zeng et al. [47] reported that NSAIDs may change the US features of Hoffa’s fat pad by reducing inflammation and blood flow in the area. Moreover, physical therapy is usually advised for the implementation of rehabilitation exercises targeted at strengthening the muscles surrounding the knee joint [48]. These treatments are aimed at enhancing joint function and reducing the impact of obesity on Hoffa’s fat pad, as revealed by positive alterations in US imaging parameters [48]. A delay in identifying inflammation in Hoffa’s pad may trigger a series of structural changes in the knee joint, leading to some complications [49].
US-guided intra-articular injections represent a major improvement in the precision and safety of therapeutic interventions. By providing real-time visualization of anatomical landmarks, US enables clinicians to accurately target inflamed tissues, minimizing complications and maximizing therapeutic efficacy [45].
The benefits of US guidance are evident in the administration of corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid injections, which minimize procedural discomfort and reduce the psychological burden often associated with interventions in children [50]. It has been proven that US guidance reduces the risk of misplacement, achieving over 95% accuracy in delivering medication to the intra-articular space compared with blind techniques, which have a success rate as low as 70% in patients with obesity [51].
US-guided procedures also facilitate minimally invasive interventions, such as aspiration of joint effusion, drainage of Baker’s cysts, and biopsies of synovial tissue. These procedures are critical in both diagnostic confirmation and therapeutic management and may reduce the need for more invasive surgical approaches. By ensuring precise drug delivery and avoiding damage to adjacent structures, US-guided procedures optimize treatment outcomes while maintaining patient safety and comfort [52]. Lifestyle changes and pharmacological interventions are crucial for preventing long-term musculoskeletal complications in children by addressing underlying obesity and its inflammatory effects [53]. Figure 3 provides examples of an US evaluation of infrapatellar Hoffa’s fat pads.
US evaluation of Hoffa’s fat pad. 3 A-3 C B-mode US images of the knee on the longitudinal subpatellar scan plane, which provide an evaluation of Hoffa’s fat pad (area outlined in yellow) echostructure and echogenicity, compared to the patellar tendon (X). All patients were 9-year-old prepubescent females. 3 A Patient with higher BMI (BMI = 29.31, > 99th percentile) presents with hypoechoic fat pads with unidentifiable double-layer structures and larger fat pad areas (565.4 mm² right, 515.3 mm² left), potentially indicating increased tissue volume and altered composition due to greater mechanical or inflammatory stress. 3B,3 C Patients with lower BMIs (respectively BMI = 23.13, 95–99th percentile, 3B; BMI = 21.41, 85–95th percentile, 3 C) presented slightly hypoechoic fat pads with identifiable superficial septate (S) and deep homogeneously hypoechoic (D) layer structures and smaller fat pad areas (350.6 mm² right, 346.2 mm² left for BMI 23.13), which may reflect reduced mechanical stress and more preserved tissue characteristics. The OMERACT US semiquantitative scoring system revealed no signs of inflammation, such as effusion or hypervascularization, in any of these patients. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; OMERACT, Outcome Measures in Rheumatology; US, ultrasound
Conclusions
Obesity is not just a deposit of extra fat but also an active endocrine tissue that releases different adipokines and triggers inflammatory responses, potentially leading to complications such as synovitis, cartilage degeneration, joint soft tissue damage, and osteoarthritis. Indeed, it is not merely the excess fat, but rather the active endocrine function of adipose tissue, through the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, that plays a pivotal role in joint inflammation. The infrapatellar fat pad is highly sensitive to the adverse effects of obesity, with the infiltration of immune cells producing proinflammatory cytokines playing a key role in the pathogenesis of joint disease and related complications. Hypertrophy with reduced echogenicity is the typical US finding of acute inflammation and may serve as a predictive marker for the development of joint destruction. The overload of mechanical pressure on joints leads to microtrauma, intensifying the inflammatory reaction and worsening joint degeneration. Moreover, these changes seem to be reversible, as shown by weight loss interventions that decrease US signals.
US is a noninvasive, accessible method for detecting and monitoring Hoffa’s fat pad inflammation. Based on the current literature, while US screening for knee joint inflammation in children with obesity shows promise, the evidence is not yet sufficient to recommend routine screening for all joint regions. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal screening protocols and to establish whether a targeted approach. The associations among US findings, obesity, and inflammation therefore emphasize the necessity of future research on specific interventions and possible changes in clinical practices to reduce the effect of the epidemic of obesity on children’s joint health.
Data availability
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- BAI:
-
Body Adiposity Index
- BMI:
-
Body Mass Index
- FMI:
-
Fat Mass Index
- IL-6:
-
Interleukin-6
- MRI:
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- NSAIDs:
-
Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs
- RI:
-
Resistive Index
- TNF-α:
-
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
- US:
-
Ultrasound
References
Sanyaolu A, Okorie C, Qi X, Locke J, Rehman S. Childhood and adolescent obesity in the united States: A public health concern. Glob Pediatr Health. 2019;6:2333794X19891305.
Dimitri P. The impact of childhood obesity on skeletal health and development. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2019;28:4–17.
Nedunchezhiyan U, Varughese I, Sun AR, Wu X, Crawford R, Prasadam I. Obesity, inflammation, and immune system in osteoarthritis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:907750.
Braun S, Zaucke F, Brenneis M, Rapp AE, Pollinger P, Sohn R, et al. The corpus adiposum infrapatellare (Hoffa’s fat pad)—The role of the infrapatellar fat pad in osteoarthritis pathogenesis. Biomedicines. 2022;10:1071.
Wang MG, Seale P, Furman D. The infrapatellar fat pad in inflammaging, knee joint health, and osteoarthritis. NPJ Aging. 2024;10:34.
Clockaerts S, Bastiaansen-Jenniskens YM, Runhaar J, Van Osch GJVM, Van Offel JF, Verhaar Ja. The infrapatellar fat pad should be considered as an active Osteoarthritic joint tissue: a narrative review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18:876–82.
Yang H, Li C, Li Y, Tai R, Sun C. Adipose-derived stem cells and obesity: the spear and shield relationship. Genes Dis. 2023;10:175–86.
La Bella S, Rinaldi M, Di Ludovico A, Di Donato G, Di Donato G, Salpietro V, et al. Genetic background and molecular mechanisms of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:1846.
Saxena S, Patel DD, Shah A, Doctor M. Fat chance for hidden lesions: pictorial review of Hoffa’s fat pad lesions. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2021;31:961–74.
Basha MAA, Eldib DB, Aly SA, Azmy TM, Mahmoud NEM, Ghandour TM, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in the assessment of anterior knee pain. Insights Imaging. 2020;11:107.
Brown T, Moore TH, Hooper L, Gao Y, Zayegh A, Ijaz S, et al. Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;7:CD001871.
Anderson PM, Butcher KF, Schanzenbach DW. Understanding recent trends in childhood obesity in the united States. Econ Hum Biol. 2019;34:16–25.
Eymard F, Chevalier X. Inflammation of the infrapatellar fat pad. Joint Bone Spine. 2016;83:389–93.
Santangelo KS, Radakovich LB, Fouts J, Foster MT. Pathophysiology of obesity on knee joint homeostasis: contributions of the infrapatellar fat pad. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2016;26:97–108.
Antony B, Jones G, Venn A, Cicuttini F, March L, Blizzard L, et al. Association between childhood overweight measures and adulthood knee pain, stiffness and dysfunction: a 25-year cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:711–7.
Cao Z, Wu Y, Li Q, Li Y, Wu J. A causal relationship between childhood obesity and risk of osteoarthritis: results from a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis. Ann Med. 54:1636–45.
Kelso A, Vogel K, Steinacker JM. Ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness show sexual dimorphism in children of three to five years of age. Acta Paediatr. 2019;108:514–21.
Peltz G, Aguirre MT, Sanderson M, Fadden MK. The role of fat mass index in determining obesity. Am J Hum Biol. 2010;22:639–47.
Bergman RN, Stefanovski D, Buchanan TA, Sumner AE, Reynolds JC, Sebring NG, et al. A better index of body adiposity. Obesity. 2011;19:1083–9.
Sommer I, Teufer B, Szelag M, Nussbaumer-Streit B, Titscher V, Klerings I, et al. The performance of anthropometric tools to determine obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10:12699.
Brunner E, Ting T, Vega-Fernandez P. Musculoskeletal ultrasound in children: current state and future directions. Eur J Rheumatol. 2020;7:S28–37.
Vera-Pérez E, Sánchez-Bringas G, Ventura-Ríos L, Hernández-Díaz C, Cortés S, Gutiérrez M, et al. Sonographic characterization of Hoffa’s fat pad. A pilot study. Rheumatol Int. 2017;37:757–64.
Albano D, Aringhieri G, Messina C, De Flaviis L, Sconfienza LM. High-Frequency and Ultra-High frequency ultrasound: musculoskeletal imaging up to 70 mhz. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2020;24:125–34.
Smith E, Azzopardi C, Thaker S, Botchu R, Gupta H. Power doppler in musculoskeletal ultrasound: uses, pitfalls and principles to overcome its shortcomings. J Ultrasound. 2021;24:151–6.
Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK. Ultrasound elastography: review of techniques and clinical applications. Theranostics. 2017;7:1303–29.
Leahy S, Toomey C, McCreesh K, O’Neill C, Jakeman P. Ultrasound measurement of subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness accurately predicts total and segmental body fat of young adults. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:28–34.
Płaza M, Nowakowska-Płaza A, Pracoń G, Sudoł-Szopińska I. Role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases in light of ACR/EULAR guidelines. J Ultrason. 2016;16:55–64.
Subhawong TK, Eng J, Carrino JA, Chhabra A. Superolateral Hoffa’s fat pad edema: association with patellofemoral maltracking and impingement. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:1367–73.
Sanchez-Lopez E, Coras R, Torres A, Lane NE, Guma M. Synovial inflammation in osteoarthritis progression. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022;18:258–75.
Shin Low S, Nong Lim C, Yew M, Siong Chai W, Low LE, Manickam S, et al. Recent ultrasound advancements for the manipulation of nanobiomaterials and nanoformulations for drug delivery. Ultrason Sonochem. 2021;80:105805.
Otjen J, Parnell SE, Menashe S, Thapa MM. Ultrasound-guided joint injections for MR arthrography in pediatric patients: how we do it. Pediatr Radiol. 2015;45:308–16.
Nalbant E, Nalbant H, Cay N. The role of real-time elastosonography in the diagnosis of quadriceps fat pad edema. Acta Radiol. 2022;63:1654–60.
Satake Y, Izumi M, Aso K, Ikeuchi M. Association between infrapatellar fat pad ultrasound elasticity and anterior knee pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Sci Rep. 2023;13:20103.
Manske RC, Voight M, Page P, Wolfe C. Utilizing MSK ultrasound for comprehensive assessment of the femoral trochlea: A game changer in sports medicine. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023;18:1376–80.
Draghi F, Ferrozzi G, Urciuoli L, Bortolotto C, Bianchi S. Hoffa’s fat pad abnormalities, knee pain and magnetic resonance imaging in daily practice. Insights Imaging. 2016;7:373–83.
Kakati P, Sodhi KS, Sandhu MS, Singh S, Katariya S, Khandelwal N. Clinical and ultrasound assessment of the knee in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Indian J Pediatr. 2007;74:831–6.
Vomer RP, Boggess S, Boggess B. Ultrasound evaluation of knee osteoarthritis. Cureus. 2023;15:e39188.
Najjar R. Redefining radiology: A review of artificial intelligence integration in medical imaging. Diagn Basel Switz. 2023;13:2760.
Kondo Y, Suzuki K, Inoue Y, Sakata K, Takahashi C, Takeshita M, et al. Significant association between joint ultrasonographic parameters and synovial inflammatory factors in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21:14.
Kaeley GS, Bakewell C, Deodhar A. The importance of ultrasound in identifying and differentiating patients with early inflammatory arthritis: a narrative review. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020;22:1.
Pratt AG, Lorenzi AR, Wilson G, Platt PN, Isaacs JD. Predicting persistent inflammatory arthritis amongst early arthritis clinic patients in the UK: is musculoskeletal ultrasound required? Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15:R118.
Wu P-T, Shao C-J, Wu K-C, Wu T-T, Chern T-C, Kuo L-C, et al. Pain in patients with equal radiographic grades of osteoarthritis in both knees: the value of Gray scale ultrasound. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20:1507–13.
Chao J, Wu C, Sun B, Hose MK, Quan A, Hughes TH, et al. Inflammatory characteristics on ultrasound predict poorer longterm response to intraarticular corticosteroid injections in knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2010;37:650–5.
Salaffi F, Carotti M, Manganelli P, Filippucci E, Giuseppetti GM, Grassi W. Contrast-enhanced power doppler sonography of knee synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: assessment of therapeutic response. Clin Rheumatol. 2004;23:285–90.
Block J, Berkoff M. Clinical utility of ultrasound guidance for intra-articular knee injections: a review. Clin Interv Aging. 2012;89.
Shumnalieva R, Kotov G, Ermencheva P, Monov S. Pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic approaches in Obesity-Related knee osteoarthritis. Biomedicines. 2023;12:9.
Zeng N, Yan Z-P, Chen X-Y, Ni G-X. Infrapatellar fat pad and knee osteoarthritis. Aging Dis. 2020;11:1317–28.
Nguyen C, Lefèvre-Colau M-M, Poiraudeau S, Rannou F. Rehabilitation (exercise and strength training) and osteoarthritis: A critical narrative review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;59:190–5.
Dragoo JL, Johnson C, McConnell J. Evaluation and treatment of disorders of the infrapatellar fat pad. Sports Med. 2012;42:51–67.
Ronconi G, Codazza S, Panunzio M, La Cagnina F, Ariani M, Gatto DM, et al. The effects of Ultrasound-Guided Intra-Articular injections with hyaluronic acid and corticosteroids in patients with hip osteoarthritis: A Long-Term Real-World analysis. J Clin Med. 2023;12:6600.
Park KD, Ahn JK, Lee S-C, Lee J, Kim J, Park Y. Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Intra-Articular injections by long axis in plane approach on three different sites of the knee. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92:990–8.
Gilliland CA, Salazar LD, Borchers JR. Ultrasound versus anatomic guidance for Intra-articular and periarticular injection: A systematic review. Phys Sportsmed. 2011;39:121–31.
Herouvi D, Paltoglou G, Soldatou A, Kalpia C, Karanasios S, Karavanaki K. Lifestyle and Pharmacological interventions and treatment indications for the management of obesity in children and adolescents. Child Basel Switz. 2023;10:1230.
Abelleyra Lastoria DA, Benny CK, Hing CB. Predisposing factors for Hoffa’s fat pad syndrome: a systematic review. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2023;35:17.
Calcaterra V, Regalbuto C, Porri D, Pelizzo G, Mazzon E, Vinci F, et al. Inflammation in Obesity-Related complications in children: the protective effect of diet and its potential role as a therapeutic agent. Biomolecules. 2020;10:1324.
Mărginean CO, Meliţ LE, Ghiga DV, Mărginean MO. Early inflammatory status related to pediatric obesity. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:241.
Sakowicz A, Grobman WA, Miller ES. The diagnostic utility of growth ultrasound for the indication of maternal overweight or obesity. Am J Perinatol. 2022;a–1745.
Testini V, Veronese N, Ricatti G, Paparella MT, Guglielmi G. Dimensional changes of Hoffa’s fat pad related to aging: evaluation by MRI. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2024;55:15.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, A.D.L., A.C., S.L.B.; methodology definition, A.D.L., S.L.B., I.M.; investigation, A.D.L., I.M., S.L.B., C.M.; significant contribution in their area of expertise, G.G., L.B., F.C., A.M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.D.L., I.M., S.L.B., A.C.; writing—review and editing, G.G., L.B., F.C., A.M.M.; supervision, F.C., L.B., A.M.M., C.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Di Ludovico, A., Mascioli, I., Bella, S.L. et al. Fat, flames and ultrasounds: the effects of obesity on pediatric joint inflammation. Ital J Pediatr 51, 96 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13052-025-01937-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13052-025-01937-5