From: The Italian Perinatal Surveillance System SPItOSS: insights from Confidential Enquiries
Nature of the detected inappropriate care | n | % |
---|---|---|
Failure to recognise a problem at admission/before labour | 20 | 41.7 |
Delayed/inappropriate diagnosis | 5 | |
Poor/inappropriate surveillance | 7 | |
Abnormal CTG | 5 | |
Delays in communication among health professionals | 3 | |
Failure to recognise a problem during labour | 1 | 2.1 |
Abnormal CTG or meconium | 1 | |
Failure to act appropriately during labour | 7 | 14.6 |
No CTG performed despite indications | 1 | |
Poor quality CTG | 2 | |
Uterine stimulation despite adverse effects on fetal heart rate | 3 | |
Delays in communication among health professionals | 1 | |
Failure to act appropriately after labour | 10 | 20.8 |
Delayed/inappropriate neonatal resuscitation | 4 | |
Poor/inappropriate neonatal surveillance | 6 | |
Failure to act appropriately during Cesarean Section | 3 | 6.3 |
Incorrect type of anestesia | 2 | |
Delay in fetal extraction/improper extraction | 1 | |
Failure in healthcare organization | 7 | 14.6 |
Inadequate hospital level of care | 1 | |
Delay in organizing Cesarean section (operating room unavailability) | 2 | |
Delay in organizing Cesarean section (difficulty in calling the second surgeon) | 1 | |
Delay in organizing Cesarean section (difficulty in calling the anesthetist) | 1 | |
Delay in organizing Cesarean section (unavailability of neonatologist) | 2 | |
Total instances of failures or delays | 48 | 100.0 |